Top Stories Boston

Archive for the ‘Americans for Informed Democracy’ Category

Academic freedom goes down by technicality at BC
Bill Ayers clearly was not welcome at BC — in the flesh or via satellite.

Bill Ayers clearly was not welcome at BC — in the flesh or via satellite. As has been widely reported, Boston College administrators, citing a "concern for the safety and well-being of our students," canceled a March 30 lecture appearance by the '60s Weather Underground activist, education-reform scholar, and political lightning rod. What's less well known, however, is how the BC administration orchestrated the veto after giving him a green light to speak on campus.

When they invited Ayers to speak earlier in the year, student organizers had anticipated a controversy — not because of his proposed urban-education reform lecture, but because of his "domestic terrorist" label, fueled by the 2008 presidential campaign. To play it safe, they sought administrative approval for his appearance weeks in advance. BC officials told students that beefed-up security — including undercover cops — would be necessary, but that the show could go forward.

That all changed on Friday, March 27, just three days before Ayers's scheduled appearance, when administrators dropped the ax.

Mustering the dupes
The brouhaha began when WTKK-FM (96.9) radio host Michael Graham — Boston's maestro of conservative controversies — slammed BC for hosting this "friend of the cop killers."

BC spokesman Jack Dunn, in a March 27 interview with Graham, said: "We hope the students who invited him will make the right decision, but if they don't, the administration will allow the [Ayers speech] to take place." Graham posted this quote, as well as the contact information for BC's president, directors of student affairs, and campus ministry, on his Web site.

What happened next is widely disputed, but one fact is certain: hours after Dunn's interview on WTKK, the event was canceled.

Some students and faculty suggest that wealthy BC alumni, spurred by Graham's rhetoric, threatened to withdraw donations — a claim that BC vehemently denies. Dunn told the Phoenix that the sole motivating factor was to ensure student safety "in light of an emotionally charged protest from the community." (Attempts by the Phoenix to contact decision-making administrators directly were ignored.)

Even if one takes BC at its word about the lack of donor threats, though, a picture emerges of backdoor maneuvering by the administration to exempt the event from the school's stated policy of total academic freedom for faculty. (Regardless of whether student safety was a legitimate concern, faculty sponsorship should have allowed Ayers's lecture to proceed, according to BC policy.)

Read more